Don Y wrote:
jim stephens wrote:
Don Y wrote:
If talking about the semiconductors, I worked in a lab in the 70's
that was
doing, and had done a large amount of research on
radiation hardening.
<grin> Gee, I wonder *why* they were doing that? ;-)
actually was the most elaborate curve tracer one ever could
hope to have access to. We did curve tracing in the lab to
primary standards calibrated from NBS with at the time
advanced HP 6 place voltage meters.
Reason was partly for obvious use in radiological environments,
but it was also an attempt to speed up the time element I refered
to w/o having to let semiconductors lay around for years to see
affects.
the plastics, ceramics, and metals used in the manufacture are
nowhere near as pure as the semiconductor materials used,
so they wanted to see what zapped what. gamma, xray, beta,
and alpha, and what did it do, and how fast.
when I got there, it was all over but for the lab, and the data
was published. We used the lab for other materials experiments,
and moved onto other endeavors.
We had a PDP8/I which was my intro to a computer I could
actually play with (actually also the Microdata 1600 was
around too, but there were more users for it).
the 8/I was exclusive to me, and I built an interface from
the HP voltmeters to the I so that data could be punched
on paper tape directly.
The rig that HP had sold had a data concentrator hooked to
some custom gizmo which could either record on the paper
printers that hp made that fit 1/2 an HP hole (dont recall model)
or send it out to a Friden Flexowriter. We took the paper tapes
to a DG Nova which converted the "lines" of data to card image
format, and sent them into the 360/50 we had to a big fortran
program, that did the graphing and other stuff.
It's how I ended up with an EE degree and am currently doing
embedded programming. less smoke involved.