I think Johnathan Swift was right on target with his "Modest Proposal."
If we'd provide welfare mom's with support for one child and subtract support
for 1.5 children for each additional child born thereafter, we'd get the
effect that's required.
What's more, if we'd let the illegal immigrants we deport each year get off
the plane before it lands instead of after, they'd probably not be as anxious
to come back.
Dick
----- Original Message -----
From: "R. D. Davis" <rdd(a)rddavis.org>
To: <cctalk(a)classiccmp.org>
Sent: Saturday, June 08, 2002 8:49 PM
Subject: Re: China bans toxic American computer junk
Quothe Sellam Ismail, from writings of Sat, Jun 08,
2002 at
06:56:57PM -0700:
So I guess the
solution is simple: let several billion people die off so
Earth can be brought back to equilibrium.
Sort of... only the solution can be less painful:
All people need to do is stop having so many babies. This is why I
support the "W.C. Fields Memorial Child Tax Bill," a progressively
incrementing tax on children. One child, a somewhat low tax, such as
an education tax. Two children, a higher tax is applied. Three
children, a much higher tax is applied, etc. No more tax deductions
for dependent children; instead, allow childless people to have
generous deductions for pets, computer collections (if all of the
computers are named), plants, etc. It might not hurt to outlaw the
discouragement of birth control and outlaw any religious dogma which
encourages people to have children. Give tax breaks to childless
people and don't tax them for any costs associated with children
(e.g. education, health care, etc.) Etc.... In other words, reduce
the population fairly quickly through a decline in the birth rate.
Simple, humane and effective, what?
--
Copyright (C) 2001 R. D. Davis The difference between humans & other
animals:
All Rights Reserved an unnatural belief
that we're above Nature &
rdd(a)rddavis.org 410-744-4900 her other creatures, using dogma to justify
such
http://www.rddavis.org beliefs and to justify
much human cruelty.