12 Mar
2003
12 Mar
'03
11:13 a.m.
This is all spin-mystering. A Rembrandt painting is technically no better
than a modern copy, by a technically competent artist. But it is the age
of the original creation, the materials of the day, and the fact that it
was created "then", rather than "now", that is relevant.
A Mark-8 that was built from materials and techniques of the age is more
valuable that one that someone send out now for manufacture, in my
opinion. Processes, materials and workmanship of today is different than
in past.
That is the very essence of the difference between vintage and current
design.
Do you think an Altair that is remanufactured using todays processes
(which by the way, is completely possible) is more or less valuable than
one that was created in 1976?
I was under the impression (based on previous
classiccmp discussions)
that the only way to get the bare boards was to use the plans supplied
in <whichever magazine it was> to etch your own. So how would you
define original? Etched from the plans or etched from the plans within
some short period of time from the publication date? Or maybe etched
from the plans using materials produced at the time of publication? I
have a couple of really old Radio Shack board etching kits around
somewhere. I'm sure that I bought them before 1980. Could I turn them
into gold by using them to etch a couple of Mark-8 boards? ;-) (smiley
for the humor impared)
> -----Original Message-----
> From: cctalk-admin(a)classiccmp.org
> [mailto:cctalk-admin@classiccmp.org]On Behalf Of Erik S. Klein
> Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2003 10:26 AM
> To: cctalk(a)classiccmp.org
> Subject: RE: Mark-8 Minicomputer Kit on E-bay
>
>
> >It took a while for some guys on comp.os.cpm to catch on.
> >I lurk there now and then. I was not sure whether they
> >were trolling or truly unaware that there were no original
> >kits, but then someone else clued them in.
>
> Yeah, I guess the only thing that could be original would be the bare
> boards. Everything else would just have to be contemporary materials,
> at best.
>
> I'm still guessing that the buyer expected to be purchasing an
> antique, not a recent creation.
>
> Erik S. Klein
> www.vintage-computer.com