23 Nov
2015
23 Nov
'15
11:37 a.m.
On 2015-11-23 20:26, Paul Koning wrote:
I can't remember if the RP07 shows up as supported on RSX, but I'm
pretty sure at least some documents mention it. Like I said, I did run
one for a few years. And yes, an RH70 is required. You also need to
jumper the RP07 for slow speed (there is documentation inside the RP07
on that, if people actually ever decide to try this).
Oh. It was done. RSX-11M-PLUS (but not 11M) supports it. For disks, I
don't think -11M even supports having RP and RM disks on the same massbus.
But -11M-PLUS can have both tapes and disks on the same massbus just
fine. And it can also deal with devices that are dual-ported on two
different massbuses, as long as they end up on the same system.
RSTS added MSCP support in V8, so if you want to run V7 you'll want to have a
traditional disk emulation.
Yeah. And unless I remember wrong, V8 came in 1986?
Johnny
--
Johnny Billquist || "I'm on a bus
|| on a psychedelic trip
email: bqt at softjar.se || Reading murder books
pdp is alive! || tryin' to stay hip" - B. Idol
On Nov 23, 2015, at 1:00 PM, Johnny Billquist
<bqt at Update.UU.SE> wrote:
On 2015-11-23 18:17, Guy Sotomayor wrote:
That sounds right.
RSTS/E supports mixed massbus, and supports RP07. At least in the sense of "it
definitely works". I don't think it shows up as supported in the documentation,
because as far as I remember the RP07 was not actually ever sold as a PDP11 option. But
it works just fine on a fast Massbus (one capable of supporting an RM03 rather than just
an RM02). In the RSTS/E development group, there was an RP07 which I think was used to
hold all the .LST files produced during system build.
On 11/23/15 9:11 AM, Paul Koning wrote:
Right. But then you also need to remember that there are some slight differences between
different type of disks, meaning that in DEC parlance, if you have both an RP06 and an
RP07 (for example) on the same massbus, it's called a mixed massbus, which not all
OSes supported.
As far as I can tell, disks fall into two groups, as far as massbus control is concerned.
The RM02, RM03, RM05, RM80 and RP07 is one group.
The RP04, RP05, RP06 is another. A few register addresses between the groups are the
same, but the actual register at that address is different. But if I remember right,
it's registers that have to do with error recovery, so potentially not something
people would care about in emulation anyway. But it still means there are different
drivers in the OS for them. > On Nov 23, 2015, at 10:10 AM, David Bridgham
<dab at froghouse.org> wrote:
>
> ...
> However, once we get a prototype doing something interesting, we were
> talking about looking around for people interested in helping out.
> We'll do a couple disk controllers but if someone wants to add others,
> great. Especially if someone wants to add MSCP. We're happy to skip
> that one ourselves.
I can imagine. MSCP is a large effort.
For a classic/straightforward programming interface, the Massbus disks
(RP04 and successors) are a good choice. That will take you just over
500 MB, if you emulate the layout of the RP07.
That's per-drive. Massbus allows for 8 drives per controller. And of course,
you also have the TM02/TM03 and TM78, which have yet again different registers on the
massbus.
Yes. And mixing disk and tape on a massbus is something that I don't think was done
on PDP-11s. It certainly could have been done, and it was on VMS and/or TOPS if I
remember right. While, MSCP is interesting in that it's somewhat
drive independent, it's
complex and it only really works with newer OS's.
Well, "newer" in this case is sortof anything beyond the mid 80s. :-)