3 Jan
2007
3 Jan
'07
11:11 p.m.
Richard wrote:
In article <459BAFF4.19008.F51E8B at
cclist.sydex.com>,
"Chuck Guzis" <cclist at sydex.com> writes:
Yikes. I was very, very much joking :-) But some sort of: "is it vintage or
not" page on the classiccmp website could be fun; questions could be weighted
somehow so that it doesn't favour the stereotypical computer that's huge and
has lots of flashing lights...
Well, there you go! Someone submits a system for
consideration and
list votes on it.
I think that will just lead to lots of argument about what qualifies
as a "vintage" system when instead you're really arguing about which
vintage systems are "interesting".