- Speed -
emulators are usually slower than the real thing. [...]
I was under the impression
that for many older machines (OK, not Sun
workstations) the emulator running on a fast Pentium-x was
considerably faster than th real thing.
Yes, quite likely. For such machines this argument does not apply;
that's why I specifically mentioned that most of the on-topic hardware
I have and run (and was addressing your puzzlement with respect to) was
SBus-era Suns. Perhaps even them, though probably not with a freeware
emulator. (I'd expect it to have to do some kind of JIT compilation to
native machine code to run at anything approaching full speed, and
that's a but much to ask of a freeware emulator.)
Now, some of
my stuff isn't SBus-era Suns. Much of *that* stuff I
*do* want to be able to repair down to the chip level - for example,
I have some hp300 hardware with, I suspect, a blown HP-IB driver
I assume
you've poked about on
http://www.hpmuseum.net.
No, not yet. When I saw the stuck-at fault, I shelved that project,
and haven't picked it up again even to the extent necessary to go
looking for schematics. (Especially since it was working when I
started, which means I quite likely blew it myself - perhaps I shorted
a pin to a power rail by mistake or something.)
When I do get back to that project, if I have further trouble, I'm sure
I'll mention it here. :-)
/~\ The ASCII der Mouse
\ / Ribbon Campaign
X Against HTML mouse at rodents.montreal.qc.ca
/ \ Email! 7D C8 61 52 5D E7 2D 39 4E F1 31 3E E8 B3 27 4B