3 Aug
2015
3 Aug
'15
12:57 p.m.
On Mon, Aug 03, 2015 at 12:33:33PM -0700, Fred Cisin wrote:
>> I suppose that bad sector maps for ST506/412
hard drives don't count? :-)
Once upon a time, it was the job of the OS to take this badblock count
and remap blocks itself since the drives themselves weren't smart enough.
On Mon, 3 Aug 2015, ben wrote:
--
- db at FreeBSD.org db at db.net http://www.db.net/~db
If is that bad, time for a new drive.
In
the early days, particularly when actual ST506 and ST412 were common
drives, there were VERY VERY few that had no bad tracks.
In the days of ST506/412 drives every responsible manufacturer included a
list of bad tracks. In the early days, there were plenty. That was one
of several reasons why reputable hard drive manufacturers rounded the
capacity down, rather than peddling them with the size stated to half a
dozen "significant" digits. Would you rather have a "10 Meg" drive
that
formatted out to 10.1Mebibytes, or one that formatted to 10.1Mebibytes
that was sold as being "10.653696 Meg" ("WOW! This drive is so good that
it gave me MORE capacity than it was rated for!")
For a brief while, Spinrite defaulted to retoring to service any BAD
TRACKS that passed Spinrite's tests! That was based on the assumption
that a simple read/write test is surely far more trustworthy than the
special hardware and software that the manufacturer used to decide to
tell you not to trust that track.
--
Grumpy Ol' Fred cisin at xenosoft.com