On Tue, 27 Oct 1998, Ward Donald Griffiths III wrote:
Athanasios Kotsenos wrote:
> even breaking the lists in two - on and off topic
> so that ppl with common interests can also talk about other things (like
> experiences)
> both lists would die though
I actually had a similar thought and it could work. Is it
possible to create an off-topic mailing list that is not publicly
advertised and cannot be subscribed to unless one were already a
subscriber to the on-topic one? Those that want the on-topic list
could get that, those who want both would get both and no one could
subscribe to only the off-topic one. The unwritten rule is that no new
topic could be spontaneously generated on the off-topic one and the
only new threads allowable would be those banished from the on-topic list.
Of course threads would be allowed to meander and mutate once they were
released to the off-topic list. This is just a thought. It certainly
would allow for these brief hot torrents of opinion on semi off-topic
material to run their course without inconveniencing those who wish to
only see hardcore tech info. The off-topic list would be like a sidebar
only accessible to those who read the on-topic one.
Ward Griffiths <mailto:gram@cnct.com> response:
This is not IRC, it is a mailing list. There is no
need to use the
silly little abbreviations designed to "speed up" on-line chat and
the typing of same. Use English or as close an approximation as you
can. Capital letters help as well as punctuation -- a carriage return
I too prefer to see some adherence to convention, instead of the
"barefoot in the head"-type prose in the first quote. However, I note
Ward uses a double space between the end of one sentence and the
beginning of another and I believe this is considered to be an archaic
convention in the word processing age. So we all have our own
peculiarities and I am not sure I want to hop on anyone for grammar or
punctuation. Hey---just kidding around!! There are times this list
seriously lacks any sense of humor.
-- Stephen Dauphin