1 Aug
2007
1 Aug
'07
3:06 p.m.
At 2:29 AM -0400 8/1/07, Sridhar Ayengar wrote:
Dave McGuire wrote:
They were for the SS10 and SS20, I'm not sure they'd even fit in the
SS1000. Each one filled a M-Bus slot, and the S-Bus slot directly
next to it.
Zane
--
| Zane H. Healy | UNIX Systems Administrator |
| healyzh at aracnet.com (primary) | OpenVMS Enthusiast |
| MONK::HEALYZH (DECnet) | Classic Computer Collector |
+----------------------------------+----------------------------+
| Empire of the Petal Throne and Traveller Role Playing, |
| PDP-10 Emulation and Zane's Computer Museum. |
| http://www.aracnet.com/~healyzh/ |
On Aug 1, 2007, at 1:36 AM, Zane H. Healy wrote:
Oh, THOSE...I thought they were only used in the SS1000? Or am I
getting them mixed up with another module?
They might have only been *sold* in the SS1000, but I've definitely
run them in the SS20. I suspect the configuration would probably be
called something similar to SS20/514.
>I've been nice and stable with a pair of SM71's. What I think
>would be cool to try is a pair of the dual CPU boards for a quad
>CPU system (I think they were 50Mhz). I ran my SS20 like this
>for quite some time before I upgraded to an UltraSparc based
>system.
Those would be SM100s. Made by Ross, Cypress chipset, 40MHz,
no L2 cache, and ungodly slow. A system with two SM51s will run
rings around a system with two SM100s.
Actually I was thinking of Sun's SM52, dual 50Mhz boards with I
believe 1MB cache.