5 Jan
2014
5 Jan
'14
5:35 p.m.
On 6 January 2014 01:07, Ken Seefried <seefriek at gmail.com> wrote:
But I understand your
personal perspective; when you're half-assing your way through a degree (or
task, or career, whatever) you don't much care about and probably aren't
much good at, you use tools that are the shortest short-cut to getting some
task done, minimal effort, instead of taking time to learn tools that up
your game. The world is full of second (third?) rate talent. But taking
what you're doing seriously and learning the tools needed to exceed isn't
always "elitism", it can just as well be professionalism. Just like it
isn't "elitism" to make an effort to be accurate, factual and impartial in
other professions, instead of sloppy, biased and condescending. YMMV.
So, an ad-hominem attack is your idea of a balanced reply, is it?
--
Liam Proven ? Profile: http://lproven.livejournal.com/profile
Email: lproven at cix.co.uk ? GMail/G+/Twitter/Flickr/Facebook: lproven
MSN: lproven at hotmail.com ? Skype/AIM/Yahoo/LinkedIn: liamproven
Tel: +44 20-8685-0498 ? Cell: +44 7939-087884