Someone wrote....
What does sftp offer that would benefit an anonymous
FTP setup?
the big thing that you have a problem with with FTP is the passive
vs. active issue. I don't think there is any advantage in sftp
related to that,
There's the active vs. passive issue which Sftp gets around quite handily.
But there's also the fact that ftp passwords are transmitted cleartext. You
might counter with "oh, but this is anonymous only so passwords dont
matter". Well, many ftp servers that offer anonymous access ALSO have
password authenticated users. I'd rather not put those users with higher
privs at risk because of the public users. Just keep them all encrypted.
I strongly prefer sftp over ftp... with one exception. sftp transfers are
slower than ftp transfers. I've never researched why, but would assume its
the crypto.
Also, the whole argument depends on the sensitivity of the data being
transmitted. Just from kneejerk reaction I always set up sftp instead of
ftp. But there are exceptions....
Jay West