3 Feb
2000
3 Feb
'00
8:41 a.m.
On Thu, Feb 03, 2000 at 04:30:29PM -0600, Jay West (west(a)tseinc.com) wrote:
Majordomo is perfectly capable of making the list work just the way it
always did. Period.
Well, careful -- LISTSERV also offered the "Respect" option, which
does as I describe below. I'm not sure if at UW the configuration was
Reply-to= LIST # always force Reply-To: classiccmp@...
or
Reply-to= LIST,RESPECT # only add Reply-To: classiccmp@... if sender
# didn't specify her own.
Anyone remember?
ignoring the will of the group? I would greatly
appreciate it if someone
could just authoritatively say "do it this way". I offered to do this free
of charge and I have no problem with that at all. I just don't know who to
listen to. Somebody educate me on this please.
Out of curiosity, and without any other arguments surrounding it --
are there objections to having majordomo set the Reply-To unless the
user explicitly sets it to something else? I've looked at the source
and it seems like a trivial hack, and I'd be happy to submit a patch
even if it's not going to be included in majordomo proper.
(For what it's worth, this is even a contentious issue amongst the
*developers* of majordomo! :-)
-Rich
--
------------------------------ Rich Lafferty ---------------------------
Sysadmin/Programmer, Instructional and Information Technology Services
Concordia University, Montreal, QC (514) 848-7625
------------------------- rich(a)alcor.concordia.ca ----------------------