If the name is printed on the machine (as is normally the case), then use that version!
:)
Personally I prefer ][ or //, which are more memorable to me than II (yes, I know my roman
numerals... eg. MCMXCVIII is 1998 and MMVI is 2006. Ok, bit OTT. Alot of people know roman
numerals 1 to 12 from clockfaces, but few know beyond that... or atleast in my experience
that is the case). Do any other computers use roman numerals, either in the name or for
labelling buttons/switches?
Regards,
Andrew B
aliensrcooluk at yahoo.co.uk
"Zane H. Healy" <healyzh at aracnet.com> wrote: Here is an odd question
for everyone. In a printed article, which
would be more accurate? "Apple ][", "Apple II", or "Apple
2"
Zane
--
| Zane H. Healy | UNIX Systems Administrator |
| healyzh at
aracnet.com (primary) | OpenVMS Enthusiast |
| MONK::HEALYZH (DECnet) | Classic Computer Collector |
+----------------------------------+----------------------------+
| Empire of the Petal Throne and Traveller Role Playing, |
| PDP-10 Emulation and Zane's Computer Museum. |
|
http://www.aracnet.com/~healyzh/ |