(d) Survival of programs which can read the data
structure of the file
However, (d) seems even more of a problems as programs
such as
editors abandon old formats without even retaining read only
capability within newer versions of the program.
Why on earth would anyone who cares about data preservation use a
closed data format?!
I would convert everything to plain text, one way or another. If
necessary, I would include a text file describing everything (unobvious
or not; I would prefer to describe unnecessarily than omit something I
thought obvious only for it to be unobvious to the future readers). I
don't know which natural languages will still be extant a thousand
years on, but, given the number of people today who can understand
texts from a millennium (or more!) ago, I would expect such expertise
to be available, though probably not common. This could perhaps be
improved by including a deliberate Rosetta stone - translate the text
into every sufficiently major language live at the time (which today
might mean English, Arabic, Mandarin, Russian, and Hindi, to name the
ones that come to my mind immediately). It might also help to treat
the future readers as first-contact aliens (because, mentally, they
very well might amount to that) and include a prelude along those
lines; people have given a good deal of thought to that question and
their recommendations might be worth reading.
As for character-set encoding, I see no alternative but to assume that
the future readers are at least as competent at breaking simple
substitution ciphers as we are, which pretty much amounts to ignoring
the issue. If you're including a first-contact style prelude, it may
be able to help.
I do agree that current DVD players are still able to
read the data
from any original DVD media burned when they first became available.
Were the first DVDs burned? I've always assumed they were pressed,
more or less like CDs. Am I wrong?
Perhaps DVD's will be one of the very few hardware
media which will
survive much longer than usual. But more than even 100 years seems
entirely unlikely.
Yeah. Compare today to 1913....
/~\ The ASCII Mouse
\ / Ribbon Campaign
X Against HTML mouse at
rodents-montreal.org
/ \ Email! 7D C8 61 52 5D E7 2D 39 4E F1 31 3E E8 B3 27 4B