21 Jun
2002
21 Jun
'02
1:53 p.m.
--- Doc <doc(a)mdrconsult.com> wrote:
Not a case of want. If I needed, for example, to make a stack of
distro floppies from images for, say. a Pro-380, there aren't a lot
of options except writing real media. I was just curious if a real
RX50 did a better job than a Teac FD55GFR or not. I would expect
"not" given the construction qualities of both devices, but I thought
I would ask.
On Fri, 21 Jun 2002, Ethan Dicks wrote:
/dev/fdX800 is major 2 minor 120, 800k, 80 tracks, double-sided 10
sector, *3.5"* device. Won't fly on 5.25".
Makes sense - it was 04:00 when I ran across it. Too bleary to notice
the minor detail of size.
> > I
have a wad of Ultrix 32m and MicroVMS diskettes...
> > ...how well does a *real* RX50 drive work with a
> > PeeCee, with or without E-11? Any advantage?
Why would anybody WANT to? :) I haven't ever even hooked up my RX50. So far,
TK50 & netboots have
been sufficient.
Don't got a DECNA. :-( TK50 and ethernet would be OK for uVAX, though.
I'm thinking PDP-11 at this point.
-ethan
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! - Official partner of 2002 FIFA World Cup
http://fifaworldcup.yahoo.com