11 May
2010
11 May
'10
7:39 a.m.
On 11 May 2010 15:06, Dan Gahlinger <dgahling at hotmail.com> wrote:
well that's definitely not true.
the structure, functions, reserved words, etc are all almost identical.
That's why i'm looking for a sample of some code.
a few (dozen) replies back someone supplied a link to some message threads
that contained some limited code samples.
but there wasn't enough there to really say anything except it was very
fortran-like
Has it not yet occurred to you that this language/tool/product may have been
based on Fortran, rather than the other way round?
--
Pete Edwards
"It looks just like a Telefunken U-47" - Frank Zappa