On 24/03/07, Randy Dawson <rdawson16 at hotmail.com> wrote:
to conclude, Ill bet with a homemade cell phone
acoustic coupler to -> RJ-45
jack interface you could get same performance as dialup, near 56K.
Sorry, but no. As a previos poster has pointed out, you'll hit the
codec (not G.711, but likely AMR for GSM phones, SMV for CDMA, or some
older codecs on TDMA systems), which tends to be speech specific, and
thus be really bad for any type of modulation coding. All POTS modems
assume a more-or-less linear channel.
You'll also hit against a few of Shannons' laws... in any case, you
can't get data through a channel at any rate higher than the lowest in
the chain - and the aforementioned codecs will give you decent speech
quality even down below 10 kbps. Furthermore, the CDMA codecs are
variable rate, since you're sharing badwidth with everyone else.
It comes down to that you really can't do better than using the data
mode of your handset. It's just that the codecs are so good the you
have the impression you're on a good line most of the time (and when
they fail, they degrade _really_ bad).
I've worked on the AMR-WB, VMR-WB and AMR-WB+ codecs (hello to anyone
from UdeS!) - it's a damn shame no one is actually
really using them
yet. The technology to have cell phones sound better than
landlines
(even at 14kbps and below) has been around for years now.
Joe.
PS. There is also a reason modems will never ever go above 56k. 56k
can only happen in the ideal case where you are really close to your
local office. At that point, the analog signal is digitized (u or
a-law) and sent over a 64kbps digital circuit - a slice of a T1 or T3
or OCwhatever. One of the bits is stolen for signaling - so your
bitrate is 7/8th of 64kbps: 56kbps. That is the slowest link in the
system to your "analog modem" ISP. And this will only work if the ISP
gets your circuit on a digital line (so the "analog modem" of the ISP
is actually fully digital) - the 56kbps modulation scheme does not
withstand a second D/A-A/D conversion.
Hooray for ADSL...