> reason to declare the "Great
war"/"World War" to be "number ONE".
> So, the use of any sort of "first" name doesn't occur until
"second"
> is expected.
On Mon, 22 Feb 2016, COURYHOUSE at
aol.com wrote:
Or WW1 was also referred to as the "war to end
all wars"
It was certainly INCONCEIVABLE that anybody could be stupid enough to have
ANOTHER one!
If we would have let Nikita go to Disneyland, then possibility of WW3
would have been less.
some good name sequence comparisons here
Where?