On 29 Jul 2008 at 10:52, Fred Cisin wrote:
On Tue, 29 Jul 2008, Chuck Guzis wrote:
To be honest, I can't tell you why I did it
that way. Probably for
compatibility's sake, but it's been too many years. I do recall
thinking that one could have TD tD Td and td as variations.
and by setting the high bit, you can have 8 variations, . . .
16 no? TD *TD T*D *T*D td *td t*d *t*d...
where the * indicates high bit set.
But then, who's counting?
Cheers,
Chuck