On Jan 28, 2017 8:51 PM, "william degnan" <billdegnan at gmail.com>
wrote:
On Jan 28, 2017 8:40 PM, "Chuck Guzis" <cclist at sydex.com> wrote:
>
> On 01/28/2017 05:12 PM, Douglas Taylor wrote:
> > I have a certificate that my father was given in 1957 for training on
> > a Honeywell Datamatic 1000 computer.
> >
> > Here is a summary of this 'advance' in computer technology from the
> > ACM:
> >
> > The DATAmatic 1000 (D-1000) is a high-capacity electronic
> > data-processing system designed specifically for application to the
> > increasingly complex problems and procedures of present-day
> > business. The system incorporates significant new systems techniques,
> > as well as several basically new component developments. One of the
> > outstanding features of the D-1000 is its ability to feed information
> > from magnetic tape into the central processor at a sustained rate of
> > 60,000 decimal-digits per second, and to deliver data after
> > processing back to magnetic tape at this same rate. The operational
> > speed of the central processor maintains full compatibility with the
> > high speed of information transfer. Consequently, the difficulties
> > caused by programs which are either tape limited or processing-time
> > limited do not arise in the majority of commercial applications of
> > this system.
>
> Doug, you can probably re-live part of your dad's experience. There are
> some Datamatic 1000 manuals on bitsavers:
>
>
http://bitsavers.informatik.uni-stuttgart.de/pdf/honeywell/datamatic_1000/
Big, wide tape reels.
--Chuck
I am pretty sure I have the first print of that manual, but I thought
Datamatic was
a pre-Burroughs machine not Honeywell...I am not home to
check, if you'd like me to I can Monday. That's the base 10 system,
right? I also have some orig decimal counter tubes IIRC too. I suppose
that all qualifies as pretty rare. Or I am confusing with a different,
similarly - named system.
Bill
Yup I must be mistaken. Nevermind I'll check when I get back to my office
B