How coome 2 of
use here (at least) seem to have contradictory =
findings?
Because it's anecdotal. BTW here's the definition:
(of an account) not necessarily true or reliable, because based on
personal accounts rather than facts or research
By the same token, your evidence is anecdotal to me. You have not
provided (for perfectly valdi reasons) any hard data, and certainly not
any hard data that I can verify. OK, I haven't either.
But I ahve to say that while you may not beleive what I see, I certainly
do. I know what components I rpelace...
Fine. There's lots of things that I've
started to say on this list to =
deal with an
argument and couldn't because it would violate various NDA's that I have =
to
live under (I kinda like my job). Arguments on this (and other fora) =
while
fun aren't worth sacrificing my livelihood.
I'm sorry if you can't/won't understand how large companies work and the
restrictions that are put on employees and the products (though some =
have
I mosster certainly understnad that (having signed a fair few NDAs in my
time too, and yes, I do honour them). And that's the 'valid reasons' I
mentioend.
But to be fair, if I can't verify the data, why on earth should _I_
beleive it? You could be telling me anything.
-tony