2 Nov
2011
2 Nov
'11
9:23 a.m.
On 11/2/11 4:30 AM, Steven Hirsch wrote:
And what prevents them from "archiving" anything you send them?
From reading
their forums to turn the resulting data into an image you have
to send it to them and they have to process it. Their explination is that
the software and knowledge is beyond the pricepoint of most people
(software) and most people don't have the knowledge to decode a flux
recording....
Thanks for pointing that out. They are welcome to use whatever business/IP model
they wish, but this one bothers me enough that I would avoid the device.
I'll continue using the Catweasel and my various
other boxes to make images and hope that Philip gets the support software for DiscFerret
fleshed out in the near future.
My feelings exactly. I can't imagine any professional archive taking this group
seriously, and it is
completely opposite of CHM's policy of preserving and making available any information
on underlying
media formats that we find.