On May 5, 2016, at 1:34 PM, Chuck Guzis <cclist at
sydex.com> wrote:
On 05/04/2016 11:34 PM, William Donzelli wrote:
Wasn't minicomputer really a marketing term,
anyway? Suits and all?
Well, it was the sixties, after all. We all forget "midicomputer". :)
One thing that some may not know about the 1700 is that it had a
*per-word* protection bit as well as I/O protection on a "per device"
basis. I don't know of any other computers with that feature.
Burroughs mainframes? While the tag bits aren't quite semantically equivalent to
protection, you get some of the same benefits.
paul