13 Jul
2001
13 Jul
'01
11:56 a.m.
So that would be the KA620 processor. I had one and it would _only_ run
VAXEln, and mostly it appears that people did development on a "real" VAX
and then simply mop booted the image onto the KA620 (which it would do)
--Chuck
At 07:50 AM 7/13/01 -0700, you wrote:
On Thu, 12 Jul 2001 18:04:08 +0200 "W.B.(Wim)
Hofman"
<hofmanwb(a)worldonline.nl>
wrote:
The uVax1000 is for real time purposes. A uVax II
with a level of memory
management removed. Ran typically VaxEln. Last year I desperately needed
one to expand an industrial control application. We found one.
Wim
How many zeros in "desperatly"? I've heard of VAXeln; I don't remember
anything about a uVAX1000 in particular, but I have a foggy memory that
DEC did sell stripped hardware that would run VAXeln but not VMS. It
wasn't cheap enough to be wildly popular, ISTR. I don't think I heard
much of anything outside of DECUS symposia.
-ethan
=====
Visit "The Seventh Continent"
http://penguincentral.com/penguincentral.html
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail
http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/