20 Mar
2007
20 Mar
'07
5:26 p.m.
> More to the point, there is "good"
bandwidth and "poor" bandwidth. In my
> world, XO is considered bottom of the tier as to quality bandwidth. They
> are cheaper than most and with very good reason.
How do you determine "quality" bandwidth?
--
Not XO and Not Cogent for a start!
I have personal horror stories with both.
I agree they are tied for the lead, in the race to the bottom of this industry.
Bob