On Tue, 16 Apr 2013, John Foust wrote:
At 09:42 AM 4/16/2013, geneb wrote:
On Tue, 16 Apr 2013, John Foust wrote:
>
> Except "Well, our metadata is shit." I think he put that in there just
> to let the professional archivists blow their coffee out their noses.
The hope is to be blunt about it in order to not only be up front about
the problem, but to hopefully get volunteers to provide/improve the
metadata.
And is there a mechanism for that to happen?
I'm pretty sure it's straightforward to submit new metadata - however,
they're underingoing a commercial power upgrade at the moment and are
offline. When they're back up, I'd suggest creating an account and see
what they offer with regards to new submissions.
g.