From: mcguire at neurotica.com> Date: Mon, 15 Dec
2008 16:16:36 -0500> To: cctech at classiccmp.org> CC: > Subject: Re: Canon Cat
was: 68k homebuilts> > On Dec 15, 2008, at 1:36 PM, Chris M wrote:> >> That
machine sounds like a great deal of fun. It's a> >> shame there aren't
more of them out there.> >> > There would be if some reverse engineered the
asics. Or developed > > a generic Canon Cat board. Maybe those roms (or the forth
portion > > anyway) would work in any 68k system.> > My IBM System
23/Datamaster has a built in FORTH interpreter. > > Haven't had time to
experiment. Anyone have experience w/that?> > No, I didn't know it had a Forth,
I thought the System 23 had > BASIC in ROM. Neat!> > > What benefits does
having FORTH in rom have over BASIC? Or a ml > > monitor?
Hi
I've tried to explain this to people over the years and about the best
way I can say it is, it is about problem factoring.
Dwight
> Hmm, what benefits...Howabout "Forth is less
ugly than > BASIC"? ;) [dave ducks]> > -Dave> > -- > Dave
McGuire> Port Charlotte, FL> >
_________________________________________________________________
Send e-mail faster without improving your typing skills.
http://windowslive.com/Explore/hotmail?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_hotmail_acq_speed_…