26 Jun
2014
26 Jun
'14
11:10 a.m.
I second what Richard said, LLVM is a lot more friendly for compiler
writing.
On 26 June 2014 12:06, Richard <legalize at xmission.com> wrote:
In article
<639FFF5F324E6D409F42CF2B2F3BB56AB0FABEB1 at MBX022-E1-NJ-4.exch022.domain.local
--
Thanks,
Kevin
,
Christopher Parish
<christopher.parish at parishcomputers.com> writes:
As for software, I'm looking towards writing
a backend for GCC
(understatement x1000) and running FreeRTOS (because I'm familiar with
it,
I don't need runtime application loading, and
I'm going to need to write
drivers anyway).
You may want to consider using clang instead of gcc for your compiler.
<http://clang.llvm.org>
--
"The Direct3D Graphics Pipeline" free book <
http://tinyurl.com/d3d-pipeline>
The Computer Graphics Museum <http://ComputerGraphicsMuseum.org>
The Terminals Wiki <http://terminals.classiccmp.org>
Legalize Adulthood! (my blog) <http://LegalizeAdulthood.wordpress.com>