17 Feb
2003
17 Feb
'03
7:25 p.m.
On Tue, 18 Feb 2003, Eric Dittman wrote:
Oh, I'm sorry. You apparently didn't get the memo. The new standard in
our current US system is to provide circumstantial evidence of a claim and
then force the accused party to prove they are not guilty. Since I'm an
American citizen, I feel a right to exercise this new form of
jurisprudence myself.
In light of any hard evidence nor the Bush administration's ability to
prove itself innocent of my charges, I find them guilty. Ready the
forces.
I rest my case.
--
Sellam Ismail Vintage Computer Festival
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
International Man of Intrigue and Danger http://www.vintage.org
* Old computing resources for business and academia at www.VintageTech.com *
No, pinhead, I was pointing out that you were painting
with a
broad stroke without anything other than circumstantial
evidence.
Oh, you mean like the Bush administration's evidence regarding Iraq's
weapons of mass destruction programs?
Since when
does pointing out the obvious equate to "Bush-bashing"?
Where is your proof? Circumstantial evidence is not proof.