Chuck Guzis wrote:
But then
people said that about those floppy-connected QIC tape drives (hmm,
those were IOmega too, weren't they?) and lots of people seemed to find that
they had dreadful reliability too. Seemed nice at the time, but not so good a
few months down the line...
There was a lot of junk in the way of tape drives out at the time.
We wouldn't endorse any kind of tape that (a) didn't use a standard
SCSI interface and command set (b) didn't perform read-after-write
verification. 4mm DAT barely qualified, but we cautioned against it
as being not-quite-ready-for-serious-use. The only Travan drive that
even came close was an HP model that claimed to do read-after-write.
Our customers used this stuff out in the field almost exclusively, so
it also had to survive environmental stress.
To their credit, I've a number of Zip drives and at least 2 Jaz
drives as well as a couple of Bernoullis and they all seem to work
fine. But recommending something for rugged use is a different
matter entirely.
Most customers eventually went to purchasing hard drives to hold
backup data.
I've found that nearly any drive that claims "high performance" isn't
worth a shit.
Including modern technologies like AIT. I've never had any problem (or
at least any problem I didn't see coming...) with DLT, Ultrium, sDLT,
Magstar, 3490E or 3480.
Peace... Sridhar