22 Apr
2014
22 Apr
'14
7:27 a.m.
Well, taken on their own it's not a bad design really. The only problem is
that it was late to the game, and in a couple of crucial ways it was
inferior to the C-64, and completely lacked C-64 compatibility, in a time
where the C-64 was already well-entrenched. It was better in that it had an
increased color palette and a nicer form factor IMO.
On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 6:36 AM, Terry Stewart <terry at webweavers.co.nz>wrote:
Scorned, derided and dismissed but are they really
that bad? My take on
the Commodore 16 and Plus/4.
http://youtu.be/TdItsJVLbws
Terry (Tez)