What's a "typical use case" for this group? :-) Yes, we use it too - I use
it to get file images onto a PDP-8/e. -- Ian
________________________________________
From: cctalk-bounces at
classiccmp.org [cctalk-bounces at
classiccmp.org] On Behalf Of
Geoff Oltmans [oltmansg at
bellsouth.net]
Sent: Monday, April 11, 2011 9:39 AM
To: General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts
Subject: Re: [IP] Fwd: Columbia terminates Kermit Project after 30 years (fwd)
This doesn't strike me as a typical use case though. :)
Sent from my iPhone
On Apr 11, 2011, at 8:30 AM, Dave Mabry <dmabry at mich.com> wrote:
Geoff Oltmans said the following on 4/11/2011 8:46
AM:
Does anyone in any real sense use Kermit these
days? Even back during my bbs days Kermit was a rarely supported and/or slow protocol that
wasn't exactly a first choice. Wasn't it designed for slower packet switched
networks the likes of telenet and tymnet?
Sent from my iPhone
Well, yes, I still use it. I have occasionally needed to copy files from an 8"
floppy either in ISIS-II or CP/M format to a PC for archive on optical media or to email
to someone. The Intel MDS systems I have run Kermit nicely. And the standard Windows
software has hyperterminal with kermit protocol. So Kermit makes it easy to transfer
to/from dissimilar systems that can't be networked.
Sure it's slow. But it's very stable and reliable.