Sam wrote:
You're wrong. We won't be able to agree on
anything until we agree upon
what a "microprocessor" is. In fact, the Arabs and the Israelis will
never have peace until the definition of a microprocessor is agreed upon
once and for all (oh yeah, and what "the first" means too).
And Clinton won't be satisfied until we've defined exactly what "is"
is.
But I don't think we need a precise definition of "marketing" for the
discussion of "microprocessors", or vice versa.