19 Oct
2005
19 Oct
'05
10:11 a.m.
Hans Franke wrote:
Am 19 Oct 2005 11:23 meinte 'Computer Collector
Newsletter':
Yes, because the whole article is crap, and changing the most obvious
details doesn't help - but it makes it harder to use the article as
an example about how bad it is, that can be understood by Joe
Average.
You can probably still get to the broken version via the
web archive ... in which case everyone wins.
Antonio
--
Antonio carlini
arcarlini at iee.org
>>
So what? correcting history, just because it was someones fart ?
Huh? You'd prefer they leave the mistake?