4 Mar
2009
4 Mar
'09
12:52 p.m.
> Holds more characters, but less data than a
standard 80 column card.
On Wed, 4 Mar 2009, William Donzelli wrote:
Who used a 60 column format? I have a standard sized
IBM punch card
with the usual printing for 80 columns, but also for 60 columns. ???
The IBM interpreter, for printing on already punched cards, did not
attempt to print 80 column! Its input was 80 column cards; its output was
the same cards, with up to 60 columns of printing.