7 Mar
2017
7 Mar
'17
6:53 p.m.
On 2017-03-07 10:45 PM, Paul Berger wrote:
On 2017-03-07 10:38 PM, Fred Cisin via cctalk wrote:
Oppps I never meant to send that.....
Paul.
On Tue, 7 Mar 2017, Eric Christopherson via
cctalk wrote:
Well in Thunderbird I get two reply
buttons "Reply" and "Reply to list"
What makes it so that other mailing lists
don't unsubscribe people when
bounces occur?
This list displays (not "full headers"):
Date: Tue, 7 Mar 2017 20:23:42 -0600
From: Eric Christopherson via cctalk <cctalk at classiccmp.org>
Reply-To: Eric Christopherson <echristopherson at gmail.com>,
"General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts"
<cctalk at classiccmp.org>
To: "General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts"
<cctalk at classiccmp.org>
Subject: Re: I hate the new mail system
Some yahoos would do it as:
Date: Tue, 7 Mar 2017 20:23:42 -0600
From: "Eric Christopherson echristopherson at gmail.com [cctalk]"
<cctalk at classiccmp.org>
To: "General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts"
<cctalk at classiccmp.org>
Subject: Re: I hate the new mail system
Notice, that they also munge the From:, but they include the author's
email address buried within the munged From:.
It is not the "correct" From: and Reply-to:,
but, apparently some "modern" systems will not tolerate it done
"correctly".
Given that it is NOT going to be done "correctly", which among us are
capable of successfully working around it?
This discussion is a little like a pedantic grammar argument.
--
Grumpy Ol' Fred cisin at xenosoft.com