> I thought the touch-tone keypad was 2 transistors,
one for the
> column frequencies, one for the row frequencies. But I've never seen
> one.
No sir, it used only a single transistor. [...]
Here's a schematic
I have a telephone of probably about that era; it's the same
form-factor as a traditional rotary phone, but it has a 12-key keypad
instead of a rotary dial. I took it apart, and the dial module has
wire colours and component counts which fairly closely fit the "DIAL"
portion of your schematic, allowing me to supply some relevant but
otherwise missing information.
I assume that the Xes (eg, at the "k u" and "w x" points) are NO
switches and the single-line-cross (eg, "z y" and "e v") are NC
switches - except that my phone has one NC switch too many and one NO
switch too few to match the schematic. (One NO and one NC switch share
a contact, making them effectively an SPDT switch; I can't tell whether
it's break-before-make or make-before-break. Also, one of the other NC
switches breaks well after the other NC switches.)
Unfortunately it is assembled in such a way that I can't easily get to
the etch side of the PCB without being destructive (the connections
from the switches to the PCB were spot-welded after the
PCB was
assembled to the button panel, and while it might be possible to work
around this, I would need a thin (ca. 1mm thick) wrench or pair of
pliers, to get to nuts that are between two layers). While I might be
able to be destructive in a way that could be repaired, I don't think
curiosity is worth risking breaking the one really good DTMF phone I
have, so I can't trace my circuit to tell how well it matches your
schematic.
Also important, but not shown on your schematic, is that many of the
inductors are wound on the same axis and thus are magnetically coupled
together. There are two axes on which the inductors are wound; I
conjecture that one is for vertical and one horizontal - ie, one
high-tone and one low-tone - but where the inductors shown near the
transistor fit into this I can only speculate about. I conjecture that
one of each of the two inductors shown as being wired in series in each
of the pairs near the transistor is wound on each axis, because I don't
see any other reason for using two inductors in series like that.
The devices which I'm matching up with the black diamonds with small
white lines are small black plastic cylinders with rounded ends,
in-line axial leads, maybe 4mm in diameter and 9mm long. There is a
colour band, which is yellow on three of them and green on the other.
Seeing one in isolation, I would take them for diodes or capacitors,
but only tentatively.
The three capacitors are one cermaic disc labeled .0051 and two yellow
plastic cylinders, each labeled ".0442?F" and "?5%"; I conjecture the
two are the ones in the keypad circuit and the one is the one near the
transistor. This conjecture is reinforced by their physical placement,
which has the cermaic disc next to the transistor and the yellow
cylinders on the other side of the board.
I find only two objects I recognize immediately as resistors; they are
banded 5K1 10% (green-brown-red-silver) and 810 10%
(grey-red-brown-silver). The object I am assuming is the third
resistor is a two-terminal device which looks as though it might be
uninsulated carbon-film; the unused side is marked "45R3J". Their
positions do not lead to useful inferences as to which is which.
The transistor is in a metal-can package (the size some 8mm in diameter
and 7mm high); it is marked "12D" in three places around the top and
"3-73*" where the * represents a small black diamond, or (if you
prefer) square turned 45?, near the bottom.
The inductor assemblies are marked "2597-AS" and "573" on one,
"2597-AR" and "473" on the other.
/~\ The ASCII der Mouse
\ / Ribbon Campaign
X Against HTML mouse at rodents.montreal.qc.ca
/ \ Email! 7D C8 61 52 5D E7 2D 39 4E F1 31 3E E8 B3 27 4B