Jules Richardson <julesrichardsonuk at yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
Tim Shoppa wrote:
s/html/htm/
Ah, yes, to play search and replace myself the really correct URL is
http://frank.harvard.ed/~paulh/misc/lorenz.htm
I had to type that 4 times before I finally left the "l" off the end!
that's rather cool, though. I never thought that
the circuit to produce that
would be so simple. Well, sort-of - I doubt I've got one of those MPY634 chips
sitting around in the junk box...
The Lorenz equation is remarkable for it's conciseness. I recall that
when I first learned about it (late 80's?) I was told that it was
originally intended to model some sort of atmospheric or gas flow
phenomena.
As a practical matter you can get nearly the same chaotic behavior with less
expensive circuits that have the right kind of nonlinearities. In
my implementation the most expensive components were the ten-turn pots
and the turn-counter knobs to set the parameters. I think MPY634's are
$10 a pop, but that there are some AD parts that are equivalent and slightly
cheaper.
There are some even simpler circuits that produce chaotic behavior using
just diodes and inductors and capacitors. One of these is often called
"Chua's circuit" or "Chua's diode" if you want to go
googling.
I built this,
added some knobs to twiddle the parameters,
and hooked it up to a 10" X-Y display and am very happy :-).
It'd look nice on a Tek 555 'scope sat on top of the Elliott 803 at the museum
:-)
I highly recommend it!
Historically a lot of chaos research even in the 80's was in fact done
with analog computers. It certainly is more fun to move wires around
a plugboard and tweak knobs and see the result on the scope, as compared
with editing computer code or point-and-drool with a mouse and then
running it and then seeing the picture!
Tim.