1 Feb
2012
1 Feb
'12
12:35 p.m.
It was thus said that the Great Fred Cisin once stated:
K&R .NE. ANSI
K&R .NE. ISO
NOTE: "K&R" refers to edition ONE.
Later, K&R wrote a different book to document a different language
How does K&R C (which I don't consider C) differ from ANSI-C? I mean,
besides function prototypes, formal variable argument functions and a
standardize library of functions I can rely upon to exist?
-spc (struggling with C code at work that at one point must have been K&R,
and it shows ... ugh)
In K&R C (I don't know from ANSI), it was
recommended that an int be
whatever type was easiest to deal with.
ISO C section 6.2.5 paragraph 5 says about
the int type: