On 04/19/2012 02:07 PM, Tony Duell wrote:
Actually, I do have a photcopier... It'smodern,
and yesm, the cotnrol
electroncis is based on one ASCI, presuably a microcontroller at least in
part. But it;'s old-fashioned in that it's an optical thing, the ligt
frelected off the original is focussed on the photoconductiove drum,
there is no CCD or anything like that. And I feel I could rebuild the
complete control system if I ahd to (a lot easier than driving a random
CCD anyhow).
On the subject of old-fashioned photocopiers, someone sent the text below
to uk.d-i-y a few weeks ago - I suspect that you (and potentially a few
others here) might enjoy reading about it, even though it's rather OT (and
hence apologies to everyone else, who can stop reading now...)
cheers
Jules
I used to have an early 1960s photocopier (long since
donated to the
Science Museum) in which you had to do each stage by hand. It half
filled the garage.
A Diazo type thing?
It was a manual electrostatic plain paper photocopier. I think Xerox
produced them in limited numbers to trial the concept, before making an
automatic machine, hence the interest from the Science Museum.
The thing to be copied was placed behind a vertical glass plate, lit by
a couple of 200W lamps, opposite which was a huge bellows camera. The
camera could be moved along a graduated slide, to give an image between
50% and 200% of the original. After setting the copy ratio, you put a
ground glass screen into the back of the camera, to set the focus.
You then put a coated flat plate, mounted in a wooden frame, into an
electrostatic charging chamber, ran the charging cycle and slid a
lightproof shield over the coated side, before removing the plate from
the chamber. The plate then replaced the ground glass screen and you
withdrew the lightproof shield for the required exposure time, which
IIRC was quite long. Once exposure was over, the lightproof shield went
back in place and the coated plate went on top of another chamber, which
contained a mixture of beads and toner powder. The shield came off again
and the whole chamber was turned upside down and rocked to and fro on a
central pivot, to run the beads and toner over the exposed plate. The
toner stuck to the areas that had not been exposed to light in the
camera (i.e. the black bits on the image of the original).
Once that was done, the plate could be removed from the toner chamber
(after turning it the right way up) and a sheet of paper placed, very
carefully, over the coated surface. I think there was something to hold
it in place. the whole lot now went back into the electrostatic chamber
and the charge reversed, so that the toner was drawn onto the paper.
ISTR there was a plus and minus control, although I forget which charged
the plate and which transferred the toner to the paper.
With a bit of luck, you now had a piece of paper covered with black
toner powder, which was very delicate and easily smudged. That went into
an oven in the apparatus for a few minutes. When it was cooked, you had
your photocopy.
It took about a quarter of an hour to do a single copy, although
multiple copies could be done a bit faster per copy, as you could be
preparing another plate while the first was being exposed and be doing
the toner for that while the first page was cooking.