10 Aug
2004
10 Aug
'04
4:38 p.m.
I'm
tempted to say that we should leave copy protection hacks out of
the spec for now, but if it was extensible, that would be great.
Yes, copy
protection will defintely be able to be described naturally
in the specification I have in mind. The spec should be able to
define several layers of bit storage: logical (files, directories,
etc.), byte (e.g. tracks, sectors), and raw (bit streams). In this
way, copy protection schemes can be preserved by storing the image in
the raw format.