10 May
2001
10 May
'01
11:14 a.m.
XenoSoft skrev:
On Wed, 9 May 2001, Jeff Hellige wrote:
> monitor. It's doubtful that the II would do be able to do 800 x 600 in
> it's vertical freq. range, which is why NEC lists it as a max.
> resolution of 800 x 560. I believe at that resolution they list it at a
> vert. freq. of 56 Hz. Even if it could take the vertical freq. low
> enough to get to 800 x 600 I wouldn't want to have to look at it. 56 Hz
> will flicker enough as it is.
Once, in the 80's I tried to use one at 800 x 600.
(Brand new AST 286
with Everex VGA that had just come out, running Ventura)
Keep epileptics away from THAT flicker.
Bah, I spent my entire youth in front of a television watching my Amiga's
50 Hz interlaced signal, through RF! No fancy CVBS or Scart RGB here.
Then, when I got a proper monitor, I started running 896?600 at 72 Hz
interlaced. =)
--
En ligne avec Thor 2.6a.
I use OpenBSD 'coz it has a cool blowfish logo. The other BSDs look satanic.
- Anonymous Coward