On 12 Nov 2006 at 1:24, Jim Leonard wrote:
An 8MHz 80286 is nowhere near 5x as fast as a 4.77MHz
8088. 2.5x, sure,
but not 5x.
Under a compute-bound load, many seem to think it's pretty close to
5x. For example, see:
http://www.pcguide.com/ref/cpu/arch/perfSpecifics-c.html
http://www.ultratechnology.com/bench.htm
I'm not quoting the Dhrystone benchmark results here, because while
the sampling is large, there's just too much of an apples-and-oranges
feel about the results. I wish I could find some early iCOMP results
for the 8088 and 286.
I submit the proposition that the relative improvement in performance
between any two consecutive IBM PC models never exceeded that
obtained between the 5160 and the 5170. I recall running some very
compute-heavy benchmarks from an 8 MHz 8088 and being startled by how
much faster they ran on a 6 MHz 80286.
I believe that benchmarks tend to have a first-cousin relationship to
unvarnished mendacity, but given the combination of faster I/O and
processing speed, I think an 8 MHz 5170 comes very close to being
almost 5 times as fast as a 4.77 MHz 5160. Perhaps one of the list
members can verify this. I've got XT and AT "clones", but that might
not give an accurate reflection of performance on IBM hardware.
Cheers,
Chuck