On 10/12/10, Steven Hirsch <snhirsch at gmail.com> wrote:
On Tue, 12 Oct 2010, Jason T wrote:
And of course there is the quite-rare 3B1 10BT card.
I was lucky enough to score the 3B1 Ethernet adapter.
It makes one wonder then how hard it would be to rig up a card with a
Lance chip (7990) and either IDE or SCSI - I know there are "memory
expansion" slots, but don't know how finicky the machine might be
about borrowing some of that address space for I/O (or if the slots
could decode regions already _in_ I/O space). Abstractly, I know how
to do this on M68M machines, but I lack specific knowledge of the
innards of the 3B1/7300 to predict how this would go.
Of course, the expected market of such a peripheral would be somewhat
small, and I suppose if it were easy, there would have been something
like it 15 years ago. Still - it's easy to dream one up. Back when
they were new, I would have loved to have had one, but they were
priced far out of my reach (though many of my local friends who worked
at the Columbus Bell Labs/Western Electric plant bought them through
employee discounts - we were all part of a county-wide UUCP network in
the days before ISPs and dialup PPP links were common. Later, many of
the 7300s were gradually replaced by 386s running Interactive UNIX,
which I _could_ afford).
And, yes, the Woolongong TCP stack sucks majorly!
Was there ever an attempt made at a replacement, or was the nature of
the machine (i.e., closed-source controlled by AT&T) such that
user-initiated projects were doomed to fail?
-ethan