I know... certainly not by you. :)
They take some finesse to program, but they do have several features that are beneficial
in such a small MCU.
________________________________
From: Dave McGuire <mcguire at neurotica.com>
To: General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts <cctalk at classiccmp.org>
Sent: Wed, January 27, 2010 1:48:09 PM
Subject: Re: Editor religious wars (was Re: Museums)
Actually there hasn't been much beating up going on.
-Dave
On Jan 27, 2010, at 2:26 PM, geoffrey oltmans wrote:
All this beating up on the 8051. They are actually a
fairly capable chip. We used them quite extensively in my work.
________________________________
From: Chuck Guzis <cclist at sydex.com>
To: General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts <cctalk at classiccmp.org>
Sent: Wed, January 27, 2010 12:12:19 PM
Subject: Re: Editor religious wars (was Re: Museums)
On 27 Jan 2010 at 12:38, Dave McGuire wrote:
Standard USB host controllers are (unless this
has changed
recently) based on an 8051 core. Very deeply embedded, sure, but
that's kinda the point. ;) As I understand it, the very first
prototype implementations were discrete-chip 8051s, but probably of
some more modern incarnation, and that basic design hasn't had any
reason to change.
To some extent, that may still be true for the devices themselves.
I've still got a bunch of USB peripherals with Intel N82930A3 chips
on them, which, I believe is nothing more than a specially-configured
8051.
--Chuck
--Dave McGuire
Port Charlotte, FL