PJ writes an unabashedly fawning article highlighting the value of old computers and the
classic computer community in the context of patent litigation, and predictably that
community shits on her because she doesn't have a dedicated practitioner of obscure
arts understanding of how 20 year old computers can be preserved. Somehow, I think a
paralegal (hint: non-technical) in her (I think) 30s not steeped in computer history
beyond the SCO case can be given a pass there, but clearly some of you, the predictable
ones, have different ideas.