18 Mar
2001
18 Mar
'01
2:51 a.m.
A very reasonable hypothesis. But an unreasonable situation!
This was the SAME MACHINE with different amounts of the same memory!
(with repeatable results)
--
Grumpy Ol' Fred cisin(a)xenosoft.com
On Sun, 18 Mar 2001, Joe wrote:
I believe the original PC checked EVERY memory
location and the later
machines checked every 10th(?) memory location.
Joe
At 02:26 PM 3/15/01 -0500, you wrote:
On Thu, Mar 15, 2001 at 11:19:36AM -0800, Fred
Cisin (XenoSoft)
(cisin(a)xenosoft.com) wrote:
>> Sorry, slipped up on my question. should read:
>> Just one remaining issue: does anyone know why the P.O.S.T. takes longer
>> WITH 16K (14 seconds) than it does with 64K (9 seconds)??
>>
>> Why would MORE memory take LESS time?