Ten Year Rule

I don't know that any further classification is necessary for whether an obsolete computer is worthy of discussion. But, if one was required, my suggestion would be to base it on a expanding scale of how much system memory the machine is capable of supporting and/or how old. Most old machines that people would consider "interesting" on this list I'm sure would use far less than 128MB of system memory for example. But, of course I'm sure someone else on the list will disagree, and therein lies the problem. :) ________________________________ From: Sridhar Ayengar <ploopster at gmail.com> To: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts <cctalk at classiccmp.org> Sent: Tue, November 24, 2009 8:50:00 AM Subject: Re: Ten Year Rule Doug Jackson wrote: That's not right either. There are interesting Intel-based boxes out there. IBM PC Server 720? Sequent DYNIX boxes? Tandy 4000MC? Peace... Sridhar