300 baud was great for reading messages
I don't know - I didn't mind 2400 for that as it was "instant enough"
for
email-sized message download (it just annoyed me for other uses), but I
suspect that I'd find 300 "too slow".
Spend some time on a Citadel. It was actually ok. 1200 is readable but
you need to pay really close attention. :)
, but it
sucked hard when doing a full-disk transfer (Punter!) on a C-64.
Gah, I bet! I've done hard disk transfers at 9600 in recent times, and that
was slow enough.
The 1541 disks were 170k or so and took *forever* it seemed. :)
The sad thing
is that the net
has degraded into such a spam fest that real boards are starting to look
pretty attractive again.
I keep thinking about that. It's not only the spam, but the threats from ISPs
to start watching what we do, the users who don't know how to protect their
machines properly, or the people who over-stress the system at the expense of
everyone else. It's a far cry from what it used to be!
A ton of effort has gone into using old bbs programs and platforms on the
'net. There are a number of tools like this:
http://home.ica.net/~leifb/bbs/ which is used to put real C-64's up on the
net running a bbs. There are other programs out there that do similar
things, including fancy device drivers that look like a modem & comm port
to windows, but there's a socket on the other end instead of a modem.
Many of the older bbs programs that have source available were done using
Turbo Pascal and those are easily recompiled under Linux using FPC. I've
actually built a port of Telegard 2.7 that runs perfectly under Linux.
The only thing that is missing form most of these "glue" solutions is
encryption. It wouldn't be too hard to build a version that used SSH
instead of regular telnet...
g.
--
Proud owner of F-15C 80-0007
http://www.f15sim.com - The only one of its kind.