31 Jul
2001
31 Jul
'01
9:40 a.m.
At 10:28 AM 7/31/01 -0500, Mark Tapley wrote:
>OOooopsie. Guess we would have had to issue a formal posthumous apology.
>But it was an honest mistake, Dick, it sure *sounded* like an unprompted
>admission of guilt. The important thing, though, is it would serve as a
>strong disincentive to future illegal dumpster-divers.
On Tue, 31 Jul 2001,
John Foust wrote:
For violators where we're pretty sure but not
quite sure of guilt,
perhaps a vat of molten recycled steel would be fair.
Waitaminit!
Is there some question of whether Dick is guilty?
Sure, he might not have done THAT, but he must hav done SOMETHING.
Anyone who questions the verdict gets the next vat.